Er is de laatste jaren veel werk gedaan aan objectivering van de methode. Vindt hier recente wetenschappelijke literatuur.

Publicaties rond visuele bodembeoordeling

Leeuwen, M. van e.a. Visual soil evaluation: reproducibility and correlation with standard measurements. Soil Tillage and research vol. 178, may 2018. p 167-178.

Ball, B.C., Batey, T., Munkholm, L.J., 2007. Field assessment of soil structural quality –a development of the Peerlkamp test. Soil Use Manag. 23, 329–337. 10.1111/j.1473-2743.2007.00102.x.

Ball, B.C., Batey, T., Munkholm, L.J., Guimarães, R.M.L., Boizard, H., McKenzie, D.C., Peigné, J., Tormena, C.A., Hargreaves, P., 2015. The numeric visual evaluation of subsoil structure (SubVESS) under agricultural production. Soil Tillage Res. 148, 85–96.

Ball, B.C., Guimarães, R.M.L., Cloy, J.M., Hargreaves, P.R., Shepherd, T.G., McKenzie, B.M., 2017. Visual soil evaluation: a summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture. Soil Tillage Res. 173, 114–124. 1016/j.still.2016.07.006.

Emmet-Booth, J.P., Forristal, P.D., Fenton, O., Ball, B.C., Holden, N.M., 2016. A review of visual soil evaluation techniques for soil structure. Soil Use Manag. 32, 623–634.

Gugino, B.K., Idowu, O.J., Schindelbeck, R.R., Van Es, H.M., Wolfe, D.W., Moebius-Clune, B.N., Thies, J.E., Abawi, G.S., 2009. Cornell Soil Health Assessment Training Manual, Edition 2.0. Cornell University, Geneva, NY.

Guimarães, R.M.L., Ball, B.C., Tormena, C.A., 2011. Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure. Soil Use Manag. 27, 395–403. 1475-2743.2011.00354.x.

Guimarães, R.M.L., Ball, B.C., Tormena, C.A., Giarola, N.F.B., da Silva, Á.P., 2013. Relating visual evaluation of soil structure to other physical properties in soils of contrasting texture andmanagement. Soil Tillage Res. 127, 92–99. 10.1016/j.still.2012.01.020.

Guimarães, R.M.L., Lamandé, M., Munkholm, L.J., Ball, B.C., Keller, T., 2017. Opportunities and future directions for visual soil evaluation methods in soil structure research. Soil Tillage Res. 173, 104–113. 01.016.

Johannes, A., Weisskopf, P., Schulin, R., Boivin, P., 2017. To what extent do physical measurements match with visual evaluation of soil structure? Soil Tillage Res. 173, 24–32.

McGarry, D., 2004. A Methodology of a Visual Soil – Field Assessment Tool – to Support, Enhance and Contribute to the LADA Program. FAO, Rome.

McKenzie, D.C., 2013. Visual soil examination techniques as part of a soil appraisal framework for farm evaluation in Australia. Soil Tillage Res. 127, 26–33. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.still.2012.05.004.

Mueller,L.,Kay,B.D.,Hu,C.,Li,Y.,Schindler,U.,Behrendt,A.,Shepherd,T.G.,Ball,B.C., 2009. Visual assessment of soil structure: evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany. Part I: Comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil Tillage Res. 103, 178–187.

Newell-Price, J.P., Whittingham, M.J., Chambers, B.J., Peel, S., 2013. Visual soil evaluation in relation to measured soil physical properties in a survey of grassland soil compactioninEnglandandWales.SoilTillageRes.127,65–73. 1016/j.still.2012.03.003.